[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sup-devel] A maildir root source: syncing labels with maildirs (imap folders)
- To: sup-devel <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>
- Subject: Re: [sup-devel] A maildir root source: syncing labels with maildirs (imap folders)
- From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:08:36 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1385555365-sup-7389@indy.local>
- References: <1385392376-sup-8491@qwerzila> <1385415206-sup-5054@qwerzila> <1385476504-sup-9378@indy.local> <1385478548-sup-9110@qwerzila> <2AC33855-6B00-42FB-9F3B-D160D8B556D4@schmeiser.org> <1385484573-sup-869@qwerzila> <1385513221-sup-4344@indy.local> <1385533106-sup-5646@qwerzila> <1385555365-sup-7389@indy.local>
- User-agent: Sup/git
Excerpts from Steven Schmeiser's message of 2013-11-27 13:42:33 +0100:
> > I was thinking about changing one thing: currently messages are not
> > copied into 'archive' before it has been _no_ other labels. On GMail
> > you can still find it on the 'All mail' page on the web interface,
> > but for regular IMAP accounts that doesn't work. Should the message
> > always be copied to 'archive' when it is removed from the inbox?
> >
> > - gaute
>
> I don't have much personal preference between these two options. The
> second option is closer to Gmail's "All Mail" folder that a lot of
> people are familiar with, so maybe that is the way to go. Especially
> if the "copy" is a hard link that doesn't take up disk space.
I noticed Gmail does it that way in their IMAP interface (archive on no
other labels), thats why I did it. I guess it doesn't matter all that
much as long as we are all using Sup. Archive becomes a place for the
uncategorized. I don't delete an email from archive if it is already in
there, so if it at some point has been copied in there - it stays.
Copy is hard-link, but I doubt offlineimap is able to identify remote
identical emails. So hard-linking is only on the machine that the
link happened on.
- gaute