[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sup-talk] mailinglists in CC
Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2010-08-19 14:33:24 +0200:
> Philipp, 2010-08-19 13:52:
> > Some clients seem to put the mailinglist in the CC field.
>
> Which is pretty annoying.
Yes, but the chance of having everyone else change that is pretty slim.
> > Apparently if someone with such a client replies to me, sup will
> > automatically reply to the person, not to the list.
>
> This might (and I really am guessing here) be because sup skips
> duplicates (by message id). In the first exaple you get the mail
> twice (assuming you are subscribed to lista). The one you most
> probably get first (and gets indexed first) is the message you get
> directly and which does not have list headers. The one which makes
> the extra hop via list server (and has the list headers) gets to you
> later and is simply discarded as duplicate. When you go reply the
> mail, sup is perfectly unaware of it being a list mail.
That makes sense. Could it check for the presence of list headers and
discard the one without?
One thing I noticed with the list in CC mails is that replying to
'recipient' would reply to the list. I don't get that from a semantic
point.
> > It's really annoying to send to single people instead of the list by
> > accident.
>
> I can tell you it is _way_ more annoying to accidentally send private
> mail to list (I've done that, once _really_ badly). So this behavior
> (automatical selection between list reply and private reply) should
> IMO be conservative in this sense.
I see your point. I don't know what conservative behavior would be in
this case. I think consistency is key though.
--
Philipp
--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu
und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk