Re: [sup-talk] replacement sup wiki

[Hamish D <dmishd@gmail.com>]

>> I've set up a wiki we can use as a replacement for the old unloved
>> wiki - http://foobacca.co.uk/sup/
>
> I just tried to edit an page and got an Internal Server Error.

Oops - I've been moving the server and hadn't tested that - fixed now.

> Great work on setting up a new wiki, but I think it is even better to
> keep it all in one place so I vote for using the github wiki and to set
> up a sup/heliotrope site there when the time is ripe. What do you think?

Just re-checked and anyone with a github account can edit the wiki
through the front end, which was my main concern. So given using the
github wiki does mean everything is in one place I would now lean
towards the github wiki as the way to go.  I have pushed my wiki
contents to the github wiki to try it out and seems fine:

https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/wiki

Matthieu - do you still have a strong preference for ikiwiki?

> By the way.. at the moment I am the only public member of the github
> organization, is that by design.. ? And you could also make me an owner
> (as you previously mentioned) if that gives me the possibility to manage
> more of those things!

I've made you an owner and made myself public - the public/private
thing wasn't deliberate, just an accident of how people were added I
think.

Hamish