[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sup-devel] email threading - tree vs. graph
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:54:19 -0500, "W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:00:53AM -0800, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > ...
> > libbe.util.graph.CyclicGraphError: cycle detected:
> > Sun, 21 Fe Reinier Lamers [darcs-users] [patch167] Reintroduce UTF-8 tagging...
> > Sun, 21 Fe Reinier Lamers [darcs-users] [patch167] Reintroduce UTF-8 tagging...
> >
> > Actually the mentioned mail have Message-ID equals to In-Reply-To.
>
> Hah. That is great :p.
>
> > While I'm reporting this issue and thus won't get any such messages,
> > it would be "nice" to have a more robust behavior in case of
> > cycles. In particular these auto-cycles can be just ignored.
>
> Added a 'correct-mailbox.py' script that tries to handle all of these
> (and probably more in the future) issues in one shot.
Tried it (correct-mailbox.py) on a bigger part of my mail box and got:
libbe.util.graph.CyclicGraphError: 17 of 1000 elements not reachable from tips
--
Nicolas Pouillard
http://nicolaspouillard.fr
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel