[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sup-devel] sup for sale
Excerpts from Christian Dietrich's message of 2010-02-25 16:32:39 +0100:
> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Feb 25 15:51:55 +0100 2010:
> > But if someone wants to take the ball and be an official maintainer, I
> > will give you my blessing and the power to gem push new releases. You
> > don't even have to maintain my current crazy branching scheme!
>
> Hi,
> i haven't contributed much to sup yet (except one patch, that wasn't
> applied) but i thinks its a really great mailer, that is it worth to
> be activly continued.
>
> In the last half year i made the experience that it is easier for
> the single programmer (pusher) if he isn't the only one who is
> allowed to push the upstream repository. Because there you have
> always the possibility to say: Hm, i don't have the time in the next
> 3 weeks or so, but there is somebody else, who does merging/patching
> and bugfixing. Perhaps it isn't that bad to give push right to a
> group of people, who activly developed sup in the past.
Hi,
First; thanks to both William and Rich for the great work on sup. I'm
using it full time now since I don't-really-know-anymore, there are
occasional bugs and more than a few problems with ruby 1.9 - but things
are starting to get along. Awesome work!
I just want to support the point of Christian Dietrich of perhaps adding
another maintainer/committer to be able to take some of the load when
Rich might be busy or gone for a while. I agree that it can be
de-motivating to contribute when you see the patches pile up, I imagine
it must be harder to go through the backlog as well. Still think Rich is
the man for the job thou, so he's the boss!
Best regards, Gaute