Re: [sup-devel] call for new maintainers

[William Morgan <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>]

Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-01-27:
> I'm http://gitorious.org/~terotil

Added! And now I can ignore all your outstanding patch requests. :)

> > All I ask is that you divide things into nice topic branches and
> > merge them into next but not master.
> 
> Do you prefer basing feature branches to master or next?

Base them off of master, please. If they're based off of next, I can't
merge them into master without also merging all of next.

> Should we prefix feature branch names to keep `git branch` more
> readable?  They could be topic-* or feature-* or alike.

I don't think that's necessary. The only two integration branches are
master and next (and the release-* branches, I suppose). When I merge
things into master I will delete the remote branches as well, so we
shouldn't end up with a big mess.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel