Re: [sup-devel] sup-server revisited

[William Morgan <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>]

Reformatted excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of 2011-02-23:
> I like this, except the part that thread_labels = union(states).  It
> doesn't work correctly for "attachment" for example: it makes it look
> like the whole thread "has attachments" which doesn't make sense.

The thread has the label "attachment", but when you look at the
individual messages inside of it, you see which ones actually have the
attachment state. I think this makes sense.

> Also, you said upthread that Heliotrope was going to provide ways to
> break threads and form new ones from pieces.  I badly want this
> feature :-)  (I haven't checked Heliotrope out yet).

Yes, this will definitely be there.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel