Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup

[Reid Thompson <reid.thompson@ateb.com>]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:49:53AM -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0500, Mike Kelly wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:16:15 -0800, William Morgan
> > <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net> wrote:
> > > Reformatted excerpts from Mike Kelly's message of 2009-11-03:
> > >> As much as I hate to suggest it... RT should have all of these
> > >> qualities.
> > > 
> > > Rrrrrrrrreally. Is it a pain to set up? Why do you hate to suggest it?
> > > (I've heard people complain about it before, but I don't remember any of
> > > the details.)
> > 
> > Yes, somewhat, IIRC. But, I haven't really ever had to set it up. It's one
> > of those things which requires half of CPAN to work. So, it was annoying
> > when I made an attempt to package it for a distro, but if you're just
> > installing it following their directions, it's probably not that bad.
> > 
> > But, someone is able to get away with charging $3250 a month for a
> > "platinum" managed install of it. (Then again, some enterprises will pay
> > anything for hosting...)
> > 
> > Let me try a test install real quick, and I'll get back to you.
> 
> I just started looking at it, so not sure if it fits all needs but
> fossil has a built in bugtracker
> 
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/index.wiki
> 
forgot to mention, it's developed by the same person as sqlite 
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk