[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sup-talk] unread status



Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of Tue Dec 29 18:24:09 -0500 2009:
> Philipp Überbacher, 2009-12-30 01:12:
> > Thanks, this seems to work. What's the reasoning behind explicit save?
> 
> I'd assume performance, but (at least with Xapian) it feels like a
> non-issue.  I'd like implicit save, or automatic save after every n
> operations/seconds with $ to explicitly invoke save if the performance
> really is an issue.

I have a patch that hasn't been merged yet that completely removes the
notion of saving with '$'. It's one of the branches I keep merged in to
the branch I actually use, so I tend to forget it's not upstream. I
should dust it off and resubmit. It will cause a UI-responsiveness
regression for ferret users, but if ferret is going to be deprecated in
the next release then I don't care too much.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk