Re: [sup-talk] GPG (outgoing)

[William Morgan <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>]

Reformatted excerpts from Ian Smith's message of 2010-04-11:
> In particular, I can sign (I've been testing mostly with signatures,
> not encryption) using GPG, and send a message successfully; however,
> while sup verifies that it thinks the signature is good, hushmail
> doesn't recognize the message as having a signature (it sees
> signature.asc as an attachment, but doesn't read the message as being
> signed), and correspondents tell me that Enigmail flags my message as
> having a bad signature.

I would compare the output of sup, hushmail and enigmail on a similar
message, and see if there's anything obviously different in the MIME
structure. It's possible Sup is emitting something they don't like.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk