Re: [sup-talk] GPG (outgoing)

[Ian Smith <ismith@MIT.EDU>]

On further testing, removing my signatures (the bit at the bottom of emails,
not the digital type) makes Engimail happy.  I'm still not sure what hushmail's
problem is, but I'm working on that, as well.  So my guess is that sup doesn't
sign the signature of a message, just what it considers to be the body.

Ian

Excerpts from Sven Schober's message of Wed Apr 14 09:30:25 -0400 2010:
> Hi!
> 
> Excerpts from Ian Smith's message of 2010-04-11 12:30:59 +0200:
> > In particular, I can sign (I've been testing mostly with signatures, not
> > encryption) using GPG, and send a message successfully; however, while sup
> > verifies that it thinks the signature is good, hushmail doesn't recognize the
> > message as having a signature (it sees signature.asc as an attachment, but
> > doesn't read the message as being signed), and correspondents tell me that
> > Enigmail flags my message as having a bad signature.
> >
> +1
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> Ciao,
>  Sven
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk