[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?

To: Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
From: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:02:07 -0700
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; domainkeys=hardfail header.From=andrew@pimlott.net
Cc: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>, sjh <sjh@foolishpride.org>
Delivered-to: eg@gaute.vetsj.com
Delivered-to: sup-talk@rubyforge.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=default; d=pimlott.net; h=Received:Content-Type:Cc:Subject:From:To:In-reply-to:References:Date:Message-Id:User-Agent:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LdeKLpItdmcPXojzlhFfJldJEXkmwQMxAP24asWm9Gdz5qq5vXgTN8DAcbDLH2OVFDJoJtnmongv3n9UrljsX77lh7giIkN2NtOL4b1OeL96XoqJWgnPKxVWsIa7jce3KRnygogt3fHFIZDExWZHHrv4GWyNFLDOTCReCf7kI9Y=;
Domainkey-status: bad
In-reply-to: <1271023429-sup-9851@zyrg.net>
List-archive: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk>
List-help: <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=help>
List-id: User & developer discussion of Sup <sup-talk.rubyforge.org>
List-post: <mailto:sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
List-subscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk>, <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/options/sup-talk>, <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004080235530.8539@snarfed.org> <1271023429-sup-9851@zyrg.net>
Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org
User-agent: Sup/git

Excerpts from Rich Lane's message of Sun Apr 11 17:57:42 -0700 2010:
> Does anyone use the current sup-sync-back that only support mboxes? If
> there are no strong objections then the 0.12 sup-sync-back will only
> support maildir.

It wouldn't kill me to lose it, but I use it, and think on principle it
would be better to have an overlap period.

Andrew
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
  - From: Daemian Mack <daemianmack@gmail.com>

References:
- [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
  - From: Ryan Barrett <sup-talk@ryanb.org>
- Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
  - From: Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [sup-talk] New website design for sup - preview
Next by Date: Re: [sup-talk] New website design for sup - preview
Previous by thread: Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
Next by thread: Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread