Re: [sup-talk] replacement sup wiki

[Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>]

On 14. jan. 2013 00:40, Hamish D wrote:
>> This is excellent news, thank you for the move! I was myself considering
>> running our own bugtracker, seeing that wmorgan's github hasn't been updated
>> in the last 7 months and he is the only one being able to act on them. Same
>> thing would have to be done for the mailing-lists.
> 
> I have access to the gitorious account (can't remember if it is full
> admin rights or just push access). But I would be equally happy for
> there to be a github organisation account that a few of us were admins
> for (including wmorgan if he wanted). It would definitely be nice to
> have a working issue tracker.
> 
> Before doing more than this, might be worth seeing if wmorgan wants to
> say if he has preferences on this. My impression is that he has left
> sup behind, but would want to give a little time (a week, say) for him
> to say what he'd like before doing a load of work. I guess one key
> thing wmorgan has is the ability to push new sup gems to rubyforge.
> 
> I'd also be happy for the wiki to live elsewhere if there was some
> collective decision that it would be better elsewhere. I just thought
> I'd set it up for now.
> 
>> Speaking of the mailing list, is it okay if we hijack the wiki with
>> heliotrope content ? I read too many complaints about it being too hard to
>> install/use, and would love to fix it.
> 
> Please do put heliotrope stuff up there.

Great! I agree with the organization-plan (github or whatever with a
full project page: repository, issues, wiki..) - it really strains the
project with these administrational bumps.

Most importantly: A admin group with full access to the organization to
allow for admins/devs to go off for a while without the project staggering.

Personally I think the best is to keep everything on the same place.

Regards, Gaute