Re: [sup-talk] sup: Fix for an UndefinedMethodError

[Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com>]

Maybe William can help out?
https://twitter.com/wm/status/323175493367119873

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote:
>> If we go sup2 I would suggest the following plan:
>>
>> - Release the best we can get with the current code for 1.9.3 as a last
>> community release of sup-0.12, say.. sup-0.13.
>>
>> For sup2:
>> - Fork a new repo: sup2
>> - Go for Mail in stead of RMail (index breakage)
>> - Go for only Psych (config breakage), requires psych gem in 1.8
>> - Integrate the IMAP / label sync back stuff (personally this is what I
>> miss the most)
>> - Go for ruby 2.0.0 and maybe 1.8
>> - Get rid of all dependencies that are abandoned or deprecated (ncurses
>> gem..)
>
> And target ncursesw?
>
>> - Try to do tests on most stuff for different encodings
>> - Try to get UTF-8 / encoding right
>> - Move all the rest of the infrastructure to something the project is in
>> control of
>>
>> Would be very nice:
>> - Index migration
>> - Config migration
>>
>> For the web page (eventually):
>> - note about the original project
>> - note about the last sup-0.13 release
>> - wiki and project page for sup2
>>
>> This plan more or less holds whether we go sup2 or not, but I think it
>> is easier to get rid of the hopeless dependencies.
>
> I agree that it's worth it to drop unmaintained dependencies and just
> fix what breaks.
> It would be unfortunate to have to fork the project and make a
> different name. I wonder if Morgan has lost interest or is just busy
> with other things.
>
> Cheers,
> jof
>> @sup-devel readers: discussion is currently at sup-talk, please send any
>> responses there.
>>
>> Regards, Gaute
>>
>> On 13. april 2013 19:14, Gaute Hope wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13. april 2013 18:35, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote:
>>>>> On la. 13. april 2013 kl. 12.09 +0200, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jonathan: I put your commit into a pull request at:
>>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/19
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, re-branding and updating to web-references:
>>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/20
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> any comments on this? You can see the changes I made. I have absolutely
>>>>>>> no intentions of stepping on any toes, but this is a suggestion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, thank you very much! That looks great!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a pity that the official home page and probably first search
>>>>>>> results direct to the abandoned home and gem of sup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is too bad. Hopefully William could hand off access or at least
>>>>>> push updates somehow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If not, maybe we could stand up another domain pointing to github pages?
>>>>>> Looks like supmua.org and supm.ua are available. :p
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --j
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah.. I think some web page is pretty essential, perhaps just the
>>>>> standard github-pages domain for a start. Anyone feel up for the task,
>>>>> I'd be happy to add you to the github-organization.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. I snagged supmua.org for a year, and have it pointing at
>>>> sup-heliotrope.github.io for pages.
>>>>
>>>> Stick me on the org, and I'll see about getting a simple site started.
>>>
>>> Nice. You're on.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Gaute
>>>