Excerpts from Matthieu Rakotojaona's message of 2014-03-31 21:42:57 +0200: > Excerpts from Martin Bähr's message of 2014-03-30 11:51:43 +0200: > > some ideas: > > i'd like the ability to apply a label change to all messages that match a > > given search, not just the ones loaded into the buffer. > > > > i have imported a lot of uncategorized messages from my mutt inbox, and i > > want to make use of sup's tagging to group them. instead of loading all > > messages in a search with !! it would be nice to just let sup tagg those > > messages in the background. > > Semi-answer: bin/sup-tweak-labels is this, except it's supposed to be > used from the command line. Moreover you must exit sup because the index > can't be shared safely. > Since Sup is mostly targeted towards the ui and that use case happen > once in the lifetime of a user (hopefully !), I guess I'm ok with how > things are. I don't know how we could manage to reproduce the > bin/sup-tweak-labels _inside_ sup efficiently, but I'm open to the > discussion. We could do something similar to what tagging and + does now, but iterate over all the threads in the search without rendering them. Unless the chunks are loaded it is a matter of loading it from the index. It would be an extension to thread-index mode. Basically a command: Apply an action to all threads matching the current search. It will be the equivalent of: Search + show all (!!) + tag all + do action. - gaute
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature